# Gouvernance de l'IA en Inde : au cœur du modèle à 4 niveaux > The article explains India's AI Governance Framework (2025), its risk classification and its four-tier governance model. It shows how the Swiss GRC AI GRC Module helps enterprises inventory, assess and monitor AI systems. - URL: https://swissgrc.com/fr/gouvernance-ia-inde-modele-4-niveaux/ - Éditeur: SwissGRC® - Publié: 2025-09-17 - Dernière mise à jour: 2025-09-17 ## Points clés - The National Cyber and AI Centre (NCAIC) released the AI Governance Framework in 2025, a risk-based blueprint tailored to India. - The framework classifies AI systems as prohibited (for example social scoring), high, medium or low risk, with high-risk examples such as credit scoring, hiring tools and critical infrastructure. - The four-tier governance model spans leadership, committees, officers and technical teams, with an AI Risk and Ethics Committee (AIREC) overseeing inventories, risk classifications and approvals for high-risk systems. - The framework aligns with ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 23894 and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and it embeds DPDP and CERT-In requirements across the AI lifecycle. - All AI applications, including third-party and shadow systems, must be logged in a central registry with metadata on ownership, lineage and risk level. - The Swiss GRC AI GRC Module covers AI system inventory and classification, risk assessment, conformity and assurance, monitoring, and data governance, and it aligns with the framework's 100-day, 12-month and 24-month milestones. **AI Governance in India is becoming critical as the country’s AI revolution accelerates across digital payments, healthcare, and citizen services. With such large-scale deployment, failures or bias in AI systems can affect millions and undermine public trust. Recent regulations – the Data Protection and Digital Privacy (DPDP) Act and stringent CERT-In cybersecurity rules – have raised expectations for privacy and security by design. Enterprises now face a dual mandate: adopt AI responsibly, comply with evolving regulations, and remain audit-ready, while sustaining innovation.** India’s AI Governance Framework To address these challenges, the National Cyber and AI Centre (NCAIC) released the AI Governance Framework (2025), a risk-based blueprint tailored to India. The framework introduces a taxonomy classifying AI from *prohibited* (e.g., social scoring) to *high*, *medium*, and *low risk*. High-risk AI – such as credit scoring, hiring tools, and critical infrastructure – require stricter controls and oversight. Core design principles include privacy-by-design, security-by-design, transparency, fairness, and accountability, embedding DPDP and CERT-In requirements throughout the AI lifecycle. The framework aligns with international standards like ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 23894, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, facilitating interoperability and third-party assurance. Structurally, it mandates clear governance roles. Boards or apex committees set AI risk appetite, while an AI Risk and Ethics Committee (AIREC) oversees inventories, risk classifications, and approvals for high-risk systems. Operational roles (data stewards, model owners) ensure traceability, creating a four-tier governance model spanning leadership, committees, officers, and technical teams. Core Components - **Risk Classification:** Prohibited and high-risk AI require extensive safeguards, while medium- and low-risk systems have lighter controls. - **AI System Inventory:** All AI applications – including third-party and “shadow” systems – must be logged in a central registry, with metadata on ownership, lineage, and risk level. High-risk AI demand detailed documentation and approvals. - **Lifecycle Controls:** Governance covers data, models, applications, and operations. This includes embedding DPDP rights (consent, deletion, purpose limitation), bias testing on diverse datasets, pseudonymization, and secure development practices. - **Assurance & Monitoring:** Pre-deployment testing and continuous audits are mandated. Organizations must maintain monitoring dashboards, incident logs, and third-party conformity assessments, especially for high-risk AI. Together, these provisions establish a unified governance architecture aligned with India’s regulatory landscape. Challenges for Enterprises While the framework provides clarity, implementation is complex. Organizations must inventory large portfolios of AI systems, many spanning legacy and new technologies. Few have matured risk taxonomies or formal AI governance policies, leading to fragmented compliance. Balancing innovation speed with regulatory rigor requires resources and cultural change. Manual processes – from tracking AI use cases to compiling audit evidence – are slow, error-prone, and unsustainable. Without automation and integration, compliance risks becoming a burden rather than a foundation for trust. Swiss GRC: Operationalizing AI Governance The AI Governance Framework sets ambitious standards. Swiss GRC’s [**AI GRC Module**](https://swissgrc.com/en/ai-grc/) is designed to help organizations translate these requirements into practice, embedding governance across the AI lifecycle. **AI System Inventory & Classification** Swiss GRC maintains a centralized, always-updated inventory of AI models and applications. Each system is classified using India’s taxonomy, with metadata on ownership, purpose, data sources, and compliance status. This provides the authoritative registry the framework requires and ensures full visibility across the AI landscape. **Risk Assessment & Controls** The module supports structured assessments of AI-specific risks such as bias, fairness, explainability, and adversarial robustness. Workflows assign responsibilities, while dashboards highlight high-risk areas and gaps. This embeds fairness-, privacy-, and security-by-design practices into day-to-day operations and ensures alignment with DPDP obligations. **Conformity & Assurance** With built-in templates aligned to ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 23894, and NIST AI RMF, Swiss GRC simplifies audits and certification processes. Organizations can schedule recurring assessments, capture evidence, and generate audit-ready reports, reducing compliance workload and strengthening accountability. **Monitoring & Oversight** Continuous monitoring features track model drift, anomalies, and deviations in real time. Alerts and automated escalation workflows align directly with CERT-In’s reporting requirements. Independent validation and calibration further enhance assurance for high-risk AI systems. **Data Governance & Transparency** Swiss GRC operationalizes privacy and transparency through data lineage tracking, PII masking, and explainability tools like model cards. Linking AI systems with risks, incidents, and vendors provides a holistic governance view, embedding compliance with DPDP and sectoral regulations into the AI lifecycle. Turning Compliance into Advantage By aligning directly with the framework’s **100-day, 12-month, and 24-month milestones**, Swiss GRC enables enterprises to accelerate compliance and reduce manual effort. The platform consolidates AI governance with broader GRC functions (ERM, ISMS, TPRM, BCM, and Audit), transforming compliance from an administrative task into a driver of resilience and competitiveness. Conclusion AI Governance in India is a landmark step toward safe, accountable, and trustworthy AI. It provides both a challenge and an opportunity for enterprises: to comply rigorously while enabling innovation. Swiss GRC empowers organizations to meet these expectations by unifying AI governance, risk management, and compliance in one platform. The result is not just adherence to rules, but the ability to build AI systems that are responsible, resilient, and trusted – turning governance into a strategic advantage for India’s AI-driven future. ## Questions fréquentes ### What is India's AI Governance Framework 2025? It is a risk-based blueprint released by the National Cyber and AI Centre (NCAIC). It classifies AI systems by risk level and builds privacy-by-design, security-by-design, transparency, fairness and accountability into the AI lifecycle. ### What are the risk categories under India's AI Governance Framework? The framework distinguishes prohibited AI, such as social scoring, and high, medium and low risk AI. High-risk systems, for example credit scoring, hiring tools and critical infrastructure, require stricter controls and oversight. ### What is the four-tier AI governance model in India? The model spans leadership, committees, officers and technical teams. Boards or apex committees set AI risk appetite, the AIREC oversees inventories and approvals for high-risk systems, and data stewards and model owners ensure traceability. ### How does Swiss GRC support AI governance in India? The Swiss GRC AI GRC Module maintains a central AI inventory classified by India's taxonomy and supports risk assessments, audit-ready reporting and continuous monitoring. It includes templates aligned to ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 23894 and NIST AI RMF, and alerts aligned with CERT-In reporting requirements. ### Which challenges do enterprises face when implementing the framework? Organizations must inventory large AI portfolios that span legacy and new technologies, and few have mature risk taxonomies or formal AI governance policies. Manual tracking and evidence compilation are slow and error-prone.